Author Guidlines. Guideline for Reviewing Manuscripts |
1. Guide line for Submission and Publishing of Articles About the content. The article should contain only original material reflecting the results of the author's research not previously published and not submitted to other publications. On consideration of the submitted materials. At the first stage all scientific articles undergo mandatory testing for borrowings. Articles containing less than 70 % To the article (with the author's signature) an expert conclusion is attached on the possibility of open publication. Article format. The article should be typed in a text editor Word (with the extension *.doc or *.docx) (font — Times New Roman Cyr 14 pt, indentation — 0,5 cm, line spacing — one Margins: from above and from below — on 2,5 cm; left and right — 2 cm. Header. The UDC is placed in the upper left corner of the sheet. Further, in the center, the title of the article is printed (the capital letter is only the first one). The title of the article Below the line the text of the annotation and keywords in Russian are placed. The abstract should reflect the main topic of the article, its relevance, purpose and objectives, as well as its results. In the annotation, the author (authors) indicates Keywords — 6–8 words/phrases, which should reflect the specifics of the topic, the subject and the results of the research. It is necessary to avoid common words and phrases. Through the line in English, the author's initials and surname (s), title of the article, abstract and keywords are given. Next, the main text of the article is placed through the line. The keywords in Russian and English are available under the appropriate annotation. The word «Ключевые слова:» or «Keywords:» is printed on the left and the keywords (not more If there are notes in the text, after the main text, before the bibliographic list, the title «Notes» is typed in the center and the text of the notes, numbered in the form of an upper index (for example, 1) Formulas. Simple inline and single-line formulas that do not contain special characters (absent on the keyboard) must be typed with symbols from the keyboard without using special editors. The text of the article should contain references to information sources (at least 10–15 sources). — obligatory citation of modern works (the share of quoted publications published on the subject of the article is estimated over the past 5 years); — the existence of a balance between references to domestic and foreign publications (shows how much the author (authors) of the manuscript know the current state of the problem in Russia and abroad); — the share of links to the articles of the author (authors) published earlier should not exceed 25 % of the total number of references. References to information sources are numbered sequentially, as far as they are mentioned in the text, and are denoted by numbers enclosed in square brackets (for example, [1]). If the reference References. The text should contain links to information sources. Below the main text (or texts of notes), the title «References» is printed in the center and a numbered source list is placed through Tables are placed on a new page after the references list. The numbering of tables is made in the order of the references in the text. The table numbering is typed in bold with right alignment (for example, Table 1). Figures are sequentially placed on a new page after the tables (or references). The numbering of figures is made in the order of the links in the text. The numbering header is typed in bold No more than eight figures and tables are allowed. On the last page indicate the following information about the author (authors): surname, name, patronymic; academic degree, academic title, position, place of work, It is necessary to submit a printed version of the article (with a personal signature of the author (authors)) and an electronic version of the article (send by e-mail:
Этот e-mail адрес защищен от спам-ботов, для его просмотра у Вас должен быть включен Javascript
), Address: 644050, Omsk, Mira Ave., 11, Building 6, Office 424, OmSTU, the Editorial Board of the journal Omsk Scientific Bulletin. Tel. +7(3812) 65-32-08, e-mail: Этот e-mail адрес защищен от спам-ботов, для его просмотра у Вас должен быть включен Javascript The system of online reception of the articles is available: http://onv.omgtu.ru/article.php 2. Guideline for Reviewing Manuscripts. The procedure of reviewing Articles submitted to the editor should match the profile of the journal. Submitted by the author manuscript according to scientific research topics is sent for reviewing to the members of the editorial board in charge of this topic, and experts which are scientists and specialists Reviewers are notified that the manuscripts are the private property of the authors and are not subject to disclosure. The journal uses double-blind peer review. The review is confidential. The author of the manuscript provided a copy of the review, or a reasoned refusal, without a signature and the name, position, Confidentiality disclosure is only possible in the case of statements the reviewer of invalidation or falsification of material contained in the manuscript. If the review indicates the need to fix the manuscript, the one is sent to the author for revision. The author should make all necessary changes in the final version of the manuscript and return the corrected In case of disagreement with the opinion of the reviewer of the manuscript the author has the opportunity to give a reasonable response to the journal. The manuscript can be directed to additional review The decision on publishing the manuscript after review is made by chief editor (deputy of chief editor), and if necessary by the editorial board. Journal does not give information concerning the manuscript (including information on its receiving, content, review process, reviewers' criticisms and the final decision) to anyone other than Reviews of manuscripts are to be stored by the journal editorial for five years from the date of publication of the articles. The review can be presented in the form of expert profiles approved by the editorial board. 3. Requirements for the review The review should include a qualified analysis of the material of the manuscript, objective assessment and reasonable recommendations. The review should give special attention to highlighting the following issues: – A general analysis of scientific level, terminology, structure of manuscript, relevance to the topic; – Assessment of readiness of the manuscript for publication in respect to the language and style, meeting the journal requirements; – Scientific exposition used by the author matches methods, techniques, advice and research achievements of modern science and practice; – The admissibility of the volume of the manuscript as a whole and its individual elements (text, tables, pictures, bibliographic references); the feasibility of space in the article tables, illustrations – Place the manuscript under review among others published on this topic: what's new in it, or how it differs from others, whether manuscript duplicates the work of other authors or previously published works – find incorrect statements and errors. The reviewer should provide guidance to the author and editors to improve the manuscript. Comments and suggestions of the reviewer should be objective and global aimed at improving scientific The final part of the review assesses of the manuscript as a whole and a gives clear recommendation for reasonability of manuscript publication in the journal. In case of negative review the reviewer should justify conclusions especially convincing. |